I think it is all dependent on the trust you have about the entity providing the vaccine. Personally, I do not trust the WHO and Bill Gates. If somebody would show up and be completely transparent about his vaccine, I might be tempted to get it.
I think the basic theory behind the vaccine is solid. The application, on the other hand is not. We hear horror stories about bad applications of vaccines. These stories might be true or not, the simple fact that they are believable is enough to throw some doubts on the whole process.
Even with a good theory, vaccines are still an expression of our arrogant pretension about being smarter than nature (insert God here if you want).
Somehow, we feel the urge to intervene in natural processes. We might be fighting a virus or microbe on a plague with some vaccine but who’s to say that we are not simply postponing the problems. Maybe we are weakening the population by inoculating some peoples against some disease.
How are we certain that the vaccine has exactly the same effect that a natural immunization would have?
We can’t.
Nobody can.
We do not know enough. We will never will.
We can only know more, with time. We will never know everything. That is impossible.
>> “In April, the WHO and its partners reluctantly recommended a temporary halt to mass polio immunisation campaigns, recognising the move could lead to a resurgence of the disease.”
www.sott.net/article/440788-Vaccine-derived-polio-spreads-in-Africa-after-defeat-of-wild-virus