Reading this, I kept thinking about Alfred Korzybski’s book “Science and Sanity”. In his book, he is describing the process of abstracting in a human beings. We can only have an image of the world around us and all representations are imperfects because we leave characteristics behind when trying to “picture” the world.
He made the famous statement that “The map is not the territory”.
I think, we can only describe the micro-world (atomic and sub-atomic) with our very limited macro view. Because of this limitation, we are stuck with “strange” duality of wave and particles. That is what we “know” (wave and particles). To get an better understanding of the micro-world, we would need to get out of ourselves by using tools that are independent of our experiences . Mathematics is probably not an answer because it is only a very high abstraction of the same world we live in. We should invent a tool a little like mathematics that does not depend on our perception or view of the world.
This is the article;
“One of the weirdest theoretical implications of quantum mechanics is that different observers can give different — though equally valid — accounts of the same sequence of events. As highlighted by physicist Carlo Rovelli in his relational quantum mechanics (RQM), this means that there should be no absolute, observer-independent physical quantities.”
https://www.sott.net/article/436854-The-Universe-A-cosmic-dashboard-with-no-objective-physical-world